top of page
  • bluesky
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

82.2. City Referendum On Global Nuclear Disarmament

Feb 18, 1982
1 min read

Why should municipalities be concerned with nuclear disarmament? Is this not properly a matter for national governments? If hostilities do break out, it will be the cities and towns who will be responsible for organizing, sheltering and providing medical attention to their populations. But the nuclear destruction of facilities and injury to citizens will be so pervasive and profound that it will be a hopeless task. There are no practical steps to recover from a nuclear attack. The only recourse to preserve public health and safety is to eliminate the possibil-ity of nuclear war. On December 2, 1981, Ottawa City Council decided to hold a referendum to determine the opinion of its citizens on disarmament, and Mayor Marion Dewar has written to 1043 Canadian mayors to encourage their councils to take similar action.

Toronto City Council decided on January 28, 1982 to hold its referendum on global nuclear disarmament on election day in November. This is a tremendous achievement for Operation Dismantle; we suggest that you support them and return the enclosed questionnaire. The question to be put to the electorate is essentially the same as that on the Ottawa referendum, and the message it will bring to govern-ment is clear: the main concern of the Canadian government must be disarmament and not, as stated by the Minister of External Affairs in a recent speach in Los Angeles, “to convince the Canadian people of the necessity for strengthening the military power of the NATO allies”.

Recent Posts

See All
SfP Bulletin archive

SfP Bulletin February 2017 The President’s Corner: Science for Peace as a Foreign Language Metta Spencer Report of the Working Group on...

 
 
 

Comments


E-7705 

An important e-petition about Canada peacekeepers headcount

Science for Peace believes the UN peacekeeping mission program is an important tool for minimizing conflicts around the world. Guided by impartiality and undertaken only with the consent of warring parties, missions under this program are critical in the efforts to transition violent societies to peace.

 

We know that Canada has a long history of supporting these missions and has earned a significant reputation for its expertise in this area. Thus we have been dismayed by the fact that the actual number of Canadian peacekeepers has been drastically reduced over the last decade. Despite the paucity of our country’s contribution, we know that Canada is nonetheless recognized for its leadership and know-how.

 

We want to dramatically enlarge the contingent of Canadian Peacekeepers and play our part in the worthy project of reducing violence in this turbulent world. As well, in light of ongoing changes in Peacekeeping technology, we believe Canada should invest majorly in tech training and support for our Peacekeepers, and at the same time furnish such skill development to countries less able to provide this for their own contingents.

 

To focus public attention on this critical issue, we have created an e-petition to the government and are seeking your support.

Please have a look and sign e-7705 if you agree.

 

www.ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-7705

 

 

Gilles Fecteau

Treasurer, Science for Peace

​

​

​

​

​

Science for Peace

A Peace Education NGO

Based in Toronto

 

​355-15 King’s College Circle
Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H7 Canada

Follow Us:

Email: info@scienceforpeace.org

Registered Charity: 893240861 RR 0001

  • BlueSky
  • X
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Get Monthly Updates

bottom of page